Wednesday, June 27, 2012

My Book Blog 4: Teach Comprehension


I read this section of my book while completing the "Two Student Readers-Jeremy and Rachel" assignment, and I was able to make connections between these two texts. In Jeremy and Rachel's case, they look and sound competent, read smoothly, and can retell what they have read, but they are unable to go further in their comprehension, for example, determine what is more important in a text. Therefore, they are only "superficial readers" according to Routman. Real and good readers are always aware of their understanding or lack of understanding and always do whatever is necessary to make sense of what they are reading.



In the book, Routman argues that comprehension is critical to reading and we need to teach comprehension right from the start, from the day kids enter preschool or kindergarten. The good news is that comprehension has become a focus in our teaching; the bad news is that the teaching of comprehension strategies is often isolated from exercises. Routman describes in the typical reading classroom nowadays, teachers often focus on practicing one comprehension strategy for weeks and then move on to teach the next comprehension strategy.

That is exactly how I teach in my developmental reading course. We have a required list of strategies to go over during a semester based on the course syllabus, and we tackle those strategies one by one hoping that our students will exit our course equipped with a toolkit of comprehension strategies to use in their college reading. However, the reality is that our students spend large amount of time learning and practicing these strategies, often without knowing how to apply them and how the strategies fit into their reading of college materials. The problem, according to Routman, lies in not enough time for independent reading that enables students to use and practice these strategies.

The book then goes on to recommend the 20%-to-80% rule, which means 20% of class time allocated for explicit instruction of strategies and 80% of class time dedicated to the act of reading.

In my own teaching practice, I do leave the majority of class period for students reading practice. But a frustrating problem I have constantly experienced is that students go ahead to read with their old reading habits in spite of all the instruction on the useful strategies that were taught to them 10 minutes ago. For example, after I teach highlighting, some of the students are still reading with their hands in their pocket and their text as clean as new. Another frustrating problem with a lot of my students is that they rarely reread materials for better comprehension, even though rereading is the single most useful comprehension strategies as Routman describes it. They read through the material and then rush to do the comprehension questions. When they stumble on one question, they generally do not go back to reread the text; instead, they just go with their memory of the text or instincts. I have simply blamed some of my students for their laziness, but I am aware that as the teacher, I need to address the problems, but I have been  and am still looking for the solution…

6 comments:

  1. Your discussion of teaching comprehension sounds like what we do in elementary school: teach reading as isolated skills hoping the students can bring it together themselves and apply throughout disciplines. Many reading programs are written that way as well. The pictures the class drew in Tuesdays' online session displayed the need to bridge our Discourses or overlap them or even scaffold them to help students see connections through their Primary Discourse lenses. Maybe this is the answer so we ask ourselves how? To which their are many answers for different grade levels or levels of reading.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know, rereading is hard, in a similar vein as revising. I understand why our strugglers hesitate to reread. When something is difficult why would we want to revisit it? I've always wondered if adult education teachers do things like miscue analysis as a way to assess the needs of your readers? I bet that if it was done you could get a better idea of what skills they use and which ones they don't and then target those skills in small/independent groups. Maybe that is done and I just don't know...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think teachers of all levels have these same issues with students. You teach them a skill, they practice, you know they can do it. Then you give them a test, and they bomb it because they didn't use the skill you taught them. I wish there was a magic wand and we could get through to these kids. But I think Routman argues that they might ingrain those strategies more if the texts were more relevant to them and they were enjoying what they were reading.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you linked some section of your book with our readings. We as teachers know that we have these classifications of readers, superficial readers & real readers, as Routman calls them. We face these problems in every class. If the students have prepared from the start as Routman states and if we find such superficial readers in our classrooms, my question is do we need to change the manner of superficial readers in order to scaffold them later? if so, how could we do that? Or do we need a help from an educational psychologist? If not, does scaffolding process do this change? I mean does scaffolding include this step?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I hope to give some insight on how to get the students to re-read something. I myself am one of those students that absolutely hates to go back and re read something that I just read. I find it to be a waste of time. I get frustrated if I am not understanding it and just cast it off as unimportant. When I do re read something it is usually because I have to or on rare occasions because I feel that the information was so interesting that I need to go over it again. The purpose of the reading has to be good as well. For example: I often reread something like an email from someone close so that I can here it again to see if there is something that I missed. Why would I reread these things over and over again but not a text that is assigned for class? I relate tot the email and it is interesting to me. It has a purpose. Do the texts that are assigned in class have a purpose. Do I as a student reading the text feel that this reading is useless and wasting my time?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm enjoying the comments. It is interesting to see how many of us hate to reread. So how do we get our studetns to do it? When is it important?
    Fang, I love your honest reflections in this blog as you share so many of the struggles you have that we as educators at all different levels can relate to.

    ReplyDelete